Climate Solutionsย // ย I S S U E ย # 6 3 ย // ย G I F T S
By Mike Coren
For many of us, giving is not a habit. It certainly wasnโt for me. I wasnโt greedy. I didnโt own that much stuff, especially compared to many Americans. Big cars and houses drag me down. But I wasnโt giving regularly. I decided that needed to change. I had more money (relatively speaking) than any other time in my life. If not now, when was I going to start?
So I started automating my philanthropy. Every month, $75 is deducted from my paycheck. It goes into a separate charity account: I give it to anyone or any group I feel can use it best. From this pot, I schedule monthly donations to groups or hand it out to someone in need. From big well-known non-profits to causes close to my heartโsuch as the tiny Nantu wildlife reserve in Sulawesi, Indonesia, one of the last redoubts for the babirusa, a rare tusked pig (check out that cute face).ย
It gives me way more joy than most of my $75 purchases. Whateverโs remaining or topped upโ$574.44 in 2021โis doled out by the end of the year.
So the giving season is upon us once again. You too may have some charity to hand out this December as well. About one-third of charitable giving happens this month. While the ultra-wealthy get most of the attention, the majority of charitable dollars come from the bottom 99% of all donors, far outpacing corporations, foundations, and billionaires.
Even the pandemic didnโt dent this generosity. In 2020, the US public gave a record $471 billion to nonprofits. Thatโs about 2.3% of US gross domestic product in allโa rate that has been consistent since 1980.ย
The same generosity, however, doesnโt hold for the climate. Less than 2% of charitable dollars go to environmental nonprofits. Groups dedicated solely to climate change receive even less: just 0.4% of all charitable dollars, according to a CarbonSwitch, which analyzed about 65,000 environmental nonprofit tax returns (see their analysis below).ย Instead, most tax-deductible donations end up in two places: churches and universities.
Why does climate go begging?
One reason, I suspect, is the emotional appeal of our local church, food bank, or alma mater (and their well-oiled fundraising machines). Another, however, is that people donโt know where to give.
As someone who covers climate change every day, Iโd be hard-pressed to name the three groups Iโm sure can effectively deploy your cash.ย Luckily, a few teams of economists have stepped in to crunch the numbers about where you get the most bang for your buck.
Effective altruists try to do this by evaluating non-profits on three criteria: Is their work important? Are their aims achievable? Is their work underfunded or neglected by others?ย
Anyone who has studied economics (or purchased television advertising) knows that proving a dollar did what it was supposed to do is really tough. In philanthropy, piecing together the cause and effect of your donation is as much art as science.ย And this approach risks excluding some non-profits doing great, if less measurable, work. After all, Hothouse brings you evidence-based solutions like these (you can donate here if you feel so inclined) but weโre not yet on any national lists (ok, well at least one). Still, the approach is a powerful tool to identify a few climate nonprofits moving the needle.
This week, I interviewed two researchers who spent weeks and months pouring over reams of data to identify the most effective groups to give your dollars this holiday. Their recommendations are below.ย
A word from our sponsor ๐ A custom pair of jeans without the waste ๐
We are proud to have Unspun sponsor the Gift issue. This next month, anyone who signs up to give feedback for Unspun will get a free $40 gift card for you or a friend. Just add your email here: unspun.io/hothouse) ๐คฉ We chose Unspun because the companyโs mission is aligned with a low-carbon world: a 1% reduction in global CO2 emissions from the fashion industry.
For climate philanthropy, the more boring, the betterย
Everyone agreed on one thing: We need to fund more boring stuff. Planting trees and banning plastic straws feels right. But achieving net-zero emissions means getting laws into the federal registrar (70,392 pages and counting).ย
Daniel Stein, an economist who runs Giving Green, an evidence-based donor guide, says climate philanthropy can have the greatest impact, dollar for dollar, in the halls of national legislatures and the White House. โThe main things you have to do to fight climate change are not sexy,โ he said. โItโs coal plant regulation, electric vehicle subsidies, figuring out clean concrete. Systematic stuff.โย
Also praising the virtue of tedium is Michael Thomas, the founder of CarbonSwitch, the rare people, he says, who likes to look at IRS tax filings.
โThe groups creating a huge amount of impact arenโt getting a lot of money,โ he says. โWe need to be funding the boring work, we need to get the tedious details rightโfund groups that give donors the highest leverage for their money.โ
And whoโs doing that well? Stein and Thomas both arrived at similar conclusions in their reports: Small, nimble organizations that punch above their weight advancing strategic policies. [See the full findings by both Giving Green and CarbonSwitch.]ย
When it comes to giving, that means funding people lobbying Congress as it crafts multi-trillion-dollar spending bills. Or reframing the narrative to change public perceptions (and the political calculus) about whatโs possible on climate today.ย
Few of these organizations make the news. But, researchers say, all have proved to be formidable in the climate fight, dispatching climate and policy experts to the trenches to get their ideas into the law books. With a brief window opening in the US under the Biden Administration to pass sweeping climate policy, time is short, here are some of the organizations having the most impact in 2021.ย
Rewiring America: The positive climate story about electrifying everythingย ย
Rewiring America plans to electrify 121 million householdsโand then everything else. Its virtual offices are stacked with inventors (Saul Griffith), engineers, entrepreneurs, and policy wonks pushing policies to get buildings and vehicles off fossil fuels, and onto clean electrons. Rewiring America helped put the nationโs first national electrification bill on the floor of Congress. More importantly, theyโre rewriting the message around climate action. โItโs a great example of a group telling a different story,โ says Thomas. โThe story of environmentalism and climate action has been all about sacrifice. It turns out itโs really hard to get people to sacrifice money or the things they love. Rewriting Americaโs campaign about electrifying everything is about ways that save people money and create massive amounts of jobs. Thatโs really important as we try to reach larger and larger audiencesโand voter basesโin the climate community.โ [In my own interviews with Congressional staffers, itโs true: almost every climate bill is framed as a jobs bill.]ย
You can make a donation here.ย
Carbon180: Policy to get the CO2 outย
When I interviewed the team at Carbon180 last year, their call to remove carbon from the atmosphereโpulling greenhouse gasses out of the skyโwas a lonely one. Today, the co-founders have the ears of policymakers around the world. Giana Amador and Noah Deich spun out their non-profit from the University of California, Berkeley to advocate for tech innovation and policy. Their key insight was simple: make it easier for companies to invest in carbon removal. By helping pass a tax credit for removing carbon, they created an instant business case for investing in mitigation. โIf you tell investors, I want to save the world, but I have this technology risk, policy risk, and this market risk,โ says Carbon180โs Deich, โthe number of investors who say Iโll invest in that is vanishingly small.โ ย
Thomas says the group has become an influential counterwright to industry in Washington DC making carbon removal part of national policy. โCarbon180 means the fossil fuel companies are not the only ones writing policies on climate removal,โ says Thomas. โThatโs really important.โ
You can make a donation here.
Clean Air Task Force: Leave no climate technology behindย
After a bill is passed, thereโs something that political scientist Leah Stokes of the University of California, Santa Barbara, calls the โfog of enactment.โ Itโs up to government agencies to turn legislative language into effective regulation. Once a bill is passed, its implementation dictates its impact. Ensuring arcane rulemaking delivers the climate benefit is one of the things Clean Air Task Force (CATF) does well.
CATF now has a strong record of winning tough policy battles, spotlighting neglected technologies, and scoring national bi-partisan policy wins, from the Energy Act of 2020 to improving the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill. If youโve heard a lot about methane today, you can thank CATF for starting to sound the alarm five years ago. CATFโs Global Methane Pledge, taken up by US president Joe Biden, was signed by 105 countries at COP26 in Glasgow this fall. โClean Air Task Force focuses on policy to move the needle on neglected technologies that arenโt getting attention from government or industry,โ says Stein. โTheyโve got an exciting bunch of wins under their belt.โ
You can make a donation here
Evergreen Collaborative: Climate campaign staffers take Capitol Hill
When then-presidential candidate Jay Inslee ended his campaign in 2020, his climate team was just getting started. The team behind the Washington state governorโs campaign formed the nucleus of a new group, the Evergreen Collaborative, and immediately dove into implementing Insleeโs climate platform at the federal level.
Once Democrats re-took the House and Senate, Evergreen has proven to be among the most influential voices shaping the Build Back Better billโs climate provisions. Evergreen was โout in front of the pack on how to take all these climate policies andย priorities and make them passable,โ says Stein. โThey seem to punch above their weightโฆas one of the most effective insider policy organizations currently working to influence US federal policy.โ ย You can give to the Evergreen Collaborativeโs policy work as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit (tax-deductible) or its political activism via an associated sister organization Evergreen Action (501(c)(4).ย
You can make a donation here.ย
Growing the grassroots: When time is moneyย
For those whoโd like to give of their timeโeven as little as one hour per weekโgrassroots organizations need your help. One of those is Climate Changemakers, a 100% volunteer-built organization launched in 2020. Each week, Changemakers connects you with a (virtual) team for โsimple, productive political action with no prep required.โ Their work elects climate-friendly candidates and holds those leaders accountable once theyโre in office. Youโd be amazed at how much leverage a few persistent constituents can have over state and local elected officials.
Thank you for reading the final installment of the Gift issue! Weโll see you again in 2022.
Like what youโre reading? Share Hothouse with a friend (or many)!
Hothouse is a weekly climate action newsletter written and edited by Mike Coren and Cadence Bambenek. We rely on readers to support us, and everything we publish is free to read.ย
Good timing, well-written, practical. Excellent edition!
Every year typhoons battering the Philippines seems to be getting stronger and stronger due to disruption to our climate. This holiday seasons, it's right and just to give back to heal our planet.